Blog – CIPAA Malaysia Case Studies

In the case of Aspen Glove Sdn Bhd v Tialoc Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2024] 7 CLJ 1, the Court of Appeal had to consider the case of parties who signed...

By s 35 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”), all conditional payment clauses are void. In Lion Pacific Sdn Bhd v Pestech Technology Sdn Bhd and...

Need to Plead Specifically for CIPAA

One would imagine that demonstrating initiative is a good virtue. However, the same may not be the case if the person showing initiative happens to be the adjudicator. In Cescon...

In this episode, we consider whether a lump-sum contract with BQ attached renders the contract to become a re-measurement contract.

In this episode, we explore the question whether conditional payments in construction contracts are void only for purposes of adjudication under CIPAA or void generally.

In this episode, we consider whether the fact that the contractor is a foreign entity would justify a stay of a CIPAA decision.

It is common belief that adjudications unduly favour the unpaid party and that attempts to set aside the decision are ordinarily unsuccessful. This is due to the courts adopting a...