Blog – CIPAA Malaysia Case Studies

Can parties contract out of CIPAA 2012?*
In the case of Aspen Glove Sdn Bhd v Tialoc Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2024] 7 CLJ 1, the Court of Appeal had to consider the case of parties who signed...
||
continue reading
Lion Pacific v Pestech – how about uncertified sums?
By s 35 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA 2012”), all conditional payment clauses are void. In Lion Pacific Sdn Bhd v Pestech Technology Sdn Bhd and...
||
continue reading
Need to Plead Specifically for CIPAA
Need to Plead Specifically for CIPAA
||
continue reading
Initiative may not be a good thing
One would imagine that demonstrating initiative is a good virtue. However, the same may not be the case if the person showing initiative happens to be the adjudicator. In Cescon...
||
continue reading
Lump Sum with BQ Attached
In this episode, we consider whether a lump-sum contract with BQ attached renders the contract to become a re-measurement contract.
||
continue reading
CLM: Conditional Payments
In this episode, we explore the question whether conditional payments in construction contracts are void only for purposes of adjudication under CIPAA or void generally.
||
continue reading
CLM 20220124 Staying CIPAA decision won by foreign company?
In this episode, we consider whether the fact that the contractor is a foreign entity would justify a stay of a CIPAA decision.
||
continue reading