Blog – CIPAA Malaysia Case Studies

Adjudication Under CIPAA Act 2012 Malaysia
The Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act (CIPAA) was enacted by the government of Malaysia in 2012. It came into effect in April 2014. The Act aims at providing cost-effective,...
||
continue reading
CIPAA Act 2012: A Complete Guide To The Malaysian Construction Industry
The construction industry is the most essential part of a country’s economy. It is also a fertile ground for many disputes. Delay in payments of construction projects hinders the potential...
||
continue reading
CIPAA Procedure For Construction Disputes
The growth of the construction industry in Malaysia has given rise to several construction-related disputes. To address these problems, the Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act (CIPAA), 2012 was enacted...
||
continue reading
Breaking News: CIPAA only operates prospectively
On 16 October 2019, the Federal Court in the case of Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd ruled the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”)...
||
continue reading
Repercussions of not filing a payment response
Contrary to what is suggested in the title, the respondent in an adjudication proceeding would not be subject to repercussions if he were to not to file or serve a...
||
continue reading
To CIPAA or not to CIPAA?
Are you thinking of whether to pursue adjudication through CIPAA instead of arbitration or litigation? Here are some differences to help you make an informed decision: Statutory Adjudication (CIPAA) Litigation...
||
continue reading
Enforcing Direct Payment from Principal under s.30 CIPAA
Section 30 CIPAA provides as follows: “(1) If a party against whom an adjudication decision was made fails to make payment of the adjudicated amount, the party who obtained the...
||
continue reading
CIPAA update – A case of creeping complexities?
CIPAA Update June 2019 - a case of creeping complexities? from Kheng Hoe Advocates
continue reading