Blog – CIPAA Malaysia Case Studies

CIPAA Procedure For Construction Disputes
The growth of the construction industry in Malaysia has given rise to several construction-related disputes. To address these problems, the Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act (CIPAA), 2012 was enacted...
||
continue reading
Breaking News: CIPAA only operates prospectively
On 16 October 2019, the Federal Court in the case of Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd ruled the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”)...
||
continue reading
Repercussions of not filing a payment response
Contrary to what is suggested in the title, the respondent in an adjudication proceeding would not be subject to repercussions if he were to not to file or serve a...
||
continue reading
To CIPAA or not to CIPAA?
Are you thinking of whether to pursue adjudication through CIPAA Malaysia instead of arbitration or litigation? Let’s go over what the differences are and whether they are suitable for your...
||
continue reading
Enforcing Direct Payment from Principal under s.30 CIPAA
Section 30 CIPAA provides as follows: “(1) If a party against whom an adjudication decision was made fails to make payment of the adjudicated amount, the party who obtained the...
||
continue reading
CIPAA update – A case of creeping complexities?
CIPAA Update June 2019 - a case of creeping complexities? from Kheng Hoe Advocates
continue reading